Production support, operational governance, and the incident/problem management discipline that keeps systems predictable.
Production stability is a discipline, not a stroke of luck. From L2/L3 troubleshooting at Expedia to owning a global L1–L4 support organization at Aon, I've operated at every level of the IT operations stack — and I bring that operational grounding to advising on how to keep systems reliable without over-staffing to do it.
Operations teams are often reactive by default — firefighting the same categories of issues repeatedly because nobody has time to run a proper root-cause analysis. Without operational governance and clear reporting, leadership only finds out about a problem after it's already affected the business.
Running structured RCA on repeat incidents and redesigning the process, not just the fix.
Building the KPI and status reporting that gives leadership real visibility into system health.
Workforce and shift planning for resilient coverage across onshore/offshore teams.
Fewer repeat incidents, through root-cause fixes rather than recurring workarounds.
Operational reporting leadership can actually use to spot risk early.
A support model sized to the risk, not staffed by default.
I typically review recent incident history first to find the patterns nobody's had time to step back and see, then work with the operations team to redesign the process around the actual root causes — not just add more monitoring on top of the same gaps.
Let's find the patterns behind the recurring incidents.
Start a Conversation